\([0-9]{4}\) https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/49112 2026-04-04T11:42:29Z 2026-04-04T11:42:29Z https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/233939 2023-09-11T12:19:05Z

Corpus Methods: A New Horizon for the Experimental Philosophy of Language; Métodos de Corpus: Un Nuevo Horizonte para la Filosofía Experimental del Lenguaje The aim of this paper is twofold. First, to investigate and evaluate the current state of the experimental philosophy of language. For this purpose, I will present the two principal methodologies in the field: questionnaires and corpus methods, indicating the common and specific problems. Second, to argue that corpus methods represent a new methodological horizon for research in experimental philosophy of language for two reasons. On the one hand, because they have fewer problems than questionnaires. On the other hand, they have certain additional advantages: i) they consider a greater amount of evidence; ii) in employing them, we have the possibility of having additional information that can illuminate other aspects of the research; iii) the count with greater replicability.; El objetivo de este trabajo es doble. Primero, investigar y evaluar la situación en la que se encuentra actualmente la filosofía experimental del lenguaje. Para ello, expondré las dos metodologías predominantes en el campo: los cuestionarios y los métodos de corpus, mostrando los problemas comunes y los específicos. Segundo, defender que los métodos de corpus suponen un nuevo horizonte metodológico para la investigación en filosofía experimental del lenguaje por dos razones. Por un lado, porque cuentan con menos problemas que los cuestionarios. Por otro lado, porque tienen ciertas ventajas adicionales: i) consideran una cantidad mayor de evidencia; ii) al emplearlos tenemos la posibilidad de contar con información adicional que puede iluminar otros aspectos de la investigación; iii) cuentan con una mayor replicabilidad.

https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/233937 2023-09-11T12:19:05Z

Constructionism and anger, rage and indignation. Deconstructing the discrete and adaptive character of emotions A widespread conception of anger both within and outside academia proposes to interpret it (along with other emotions) as an adaptive response to certain recurrent problems in our evolutionary past, which implies interpreting anger as a discrete, basic, innate and adaptive emotion. In view of the crisis that the Basic Emotions thesis is going through, and taking into account a number of important objections that have been raised to the idea that anger represents a discrete emotion, I will suggest that the definitive abandonment of the concept of anger (and its close relatives, rage and indignation) has important hermeneutical advantages, including the possibility of approaching the problem of the phylogenesis of our sense of justice from a perspective that avoids the rupturist and continuist extremes that rely on a discrete conception of the emotions.

https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/233938 2023-09-11T12:19:05Z

What is ideological bias?; ¿QUÉ ES UN SESGO IDEOLÓGICO? The term ideology is usually used in three different senses, each of which alludes to a different concept: ideology in the sense originally proposed by Marx and Engels; ideology as a political thought, which ended up being the most frequently used notion; and ideology as a bias that affects the positions that can be adopted in the field of theory. This last notion will be analyzed here; trying to show its difference, but also its relationships, with the other two notions. An attempt will also be made to establish a difference between the notions of ideological bias and of political position in theory.; ¿QUÉ ES UN SESGO IDEOLÓGICO?

https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/233934 2023-09-11T12:19:04Z

De la sexta tesis sobre Feuerbach a un principio (marxista) de individuación: Étienne Balibar y la “ontología de la relación”; From the 6th Thesis on Feuerbach to a (Marxist) principle of individuation: Etienne Balibar and the “ontology of relation” Proponemos un análisis de la tesis de la “ontología de la relación” propuesta por Balibar, abordando dos momentos de su producción teórica: su lectura de la sexta tesis sobre Feuerbach de Marx como germen de una ontología relacional o de un pensamiento de lo transindividual; y un análisis del desarrollo de esta tesis en términos de lo que Balibar llama “diferencias antropológicas”. Siguiendo la propuesta de Balibar, sostenemos que los elementos teóricos básicos de un pensamiento transindividual pueden ser encontrados en las contribuciones de Althusser y Balibar en Lire Le Capital (1965), lo cual abre la posibilidad de concebir un “principio marxista de individuación”. Se concluye con una discusión sobre los límites y efectos de la tesis propuesta por Balibar.; This paper analyses Etienne Balibar’s thesis of an “ontology of relation”, considering two moments of his theoretical production: his reading of Marx’s 6th thesis on Feuerbach as the grounds for a relational ontology or a thought on transindividuality; and an analysis of the development of this thesis in terms of what Balibar calls “anthropological differences”. Following Balibar, in this paper I suggest that the basic theoretical elements of a thought on transindividuality can be found in both Althusser and Balibar’s contributions to Lire Le Capital (1965), which opens the possibility of conceiving a “Marxist principle of individuation”. I conclude by discussing the limits and the effects of Balibar’s proposal