Six month follow-up of two Bulk-fill composites in non-carious cervical lesions: Double blind randomized clinical trial.
Evaluación clínica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill: Estudio aleatorio doble ciego.;
;
| dc.creator | Vildósola, Patricio | |
| dc.creator | Nakouzi, Jorge | |
| dc.creator | Rodriguez, Sara | |
| dc.creator | Reyes, Alexandra | |
| dc.creator | Reyes, Jenifer | |
| dc.creator | Conejeros, Camila | |
| dc.date | 2019-08-21 | |
| dc.identifier | http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2019.032 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.17126/joralres.2019.032 | |
| dc.description | Objective: To assess the six-month clinical outcome of restorations of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCL) with two composite resins: Bulk-Fill and nanohybrid resin. Materials and methods: Fifty-one patients, with three NCCLs each, were randomly allocated into three restoration groups: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill (TB); Filtek Bulk-Fill (FB); y Filtek Z350XT (Z350). Adhesive techniques and restorative procedures were performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions for the different materials. A 4mm increment was applied in TB and FB, and increments of ≤2mm depth were applied in Z350. Restorations were assessed by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at six months according to the FDI World Dental Federation guidelines (1: excellent, 2: acceptable, 3: sufficient, 4: unsatisfactory, 5: unacceptable) in Marginal Staining (MS), Fracture-Retention (FR), Marginal Adaptation (MA), Postoperative Sensitivity (S) and Caries (C). Wilcoxon test was used for the comparison between baseline and 6 months, and Kruskal-Wallis for the comparison of the three groups at six months (95% significance). Results: Forty-six patients with a total of 138 restorations attended a check-up at six months and were evaluated with excellent clinical outcome. In MS, 91.2% for Z350 and 97.8% for FB and TB; in FR, 97.8% for Z350 and 100% for FB and TB; in MA, 95.6% for Z350, 97.8% for FB and 100% for TN; in S, 95.6% for all three groups; and 100% for C. No statistically significant differences were found between the three groups nor in the comparison between the baseline and 6 months (p>0.05) Conclusion: No significant differences are observed between the three groups of resins in the parameters of MS, MA, S, FR and C regarding clinical outcome at six months. | en-US |
| dc.description | Objetivo: Evaluar el comportamiento clínico a 6 meses en restauraciones de lesiones cervicales no cariosas (LCNC) con dos resinas compuestas Bulk-Fill y una resina nanohíbrida. Materiales y métodos: En 51 pacientes se restauraron 3 LCNC distribuidas aleatoriamente en 3 grupos, TB: Tetric-N-Ceram Bulk-Fill, FB: Filtek Bulk-Fill y Z350: Filtek Z350XT. Las técnicas adhesivas y procedimientos restauradores fueron realizados según las instrucciones de los fabricantes para los diferentes materiales. En TB y FB se aplicó un incremento de 4mm y en Z350 se aplicó incrementos ≤2mm de profundidad. Dos operadores calibrados evaluaron las restauraciones al baseline y 6 meses mediante los criterios clínicos FDI (1: excelente, 2: aceptable, 3: suficiente, 4: insatisfactorio, 5: inaceptable) en Tinción Marginal (TM), Fractura-Retención (FR), Adaptación Marginal (AM), Sensibilidad Postoperatoria (S) y Caries (C). Se utilizó Wilcoxon para la comparación entre baseline – 6 meses y Kruskal-Wallis para la comparación de los 3 grupos a 6 meses (significancia de 95%). Resultados: A los 6 meses asistieron 46 pacientes con un total de 138 restauraciones siendo evaluados con comportamiento clínico excelente; en TM 91,2% para Z350 y 97,8% para FB y TB; en FR, Z350 presentó 97,8% y en FB y TB el 100%; en AM, 95,6% para Z350, 97,8% para FB y 100% para TN; en S presentó 95,6% para los tres grupos; en C se presentó el 100%. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los 3 grupos y en la comparación de baseline - 6 meses (p>0.05). Conclusión: No existen diferencias significativas en el comportamiento clínico a 6 meses entre los 3 grupos de resinas en los parámetros TM, AM, S, FR Y C. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de Concepción, Chile. | en-US |
| dc.relation | http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2019.032/592 | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Oral Research | en-US |
| dc.rights | http://www.joralres.com/index.php/JOR/authorDashboard/submission/855 | en-US |
| dc.source | Journal of Oral Research; Vol 8 No 3; 210-219 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Journal of Oral Research; Vol 8 No 3; 210-219 | en-US |
| dc.source | 0719-2479 | |
| dc.source | 0719-2460 | |
| dc.title | Six month follow-up of two Bulk-fill composites in non-carious cervical lesions: Double blind randomized clinical trial. | en-US |
| dc.title | Evaluación clínica a 6 meses de restauraciones cervicales en lesiones no cariosas con resinas compuestas Bulk-fill: Estudio aleatorio doble ciego. | es-ES |
| dc.title | pt-BR | |
| dc.title | pt-PT | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | Articles | en-US |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Journal of Oral Research
[0-9]{4}