Show simple item record

dc.contributores-ES
dc.creatorJadue T, Andrés
dc.creatorGonzález L, Roberto
dc.creatorIrarrázaval Ll, Manuel J
dc.date2012-04-23
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-11T18:27:11Z
dc.date.available2019-11-11T18:27:11Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/view/1762
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/111018
dc.description  META- ANALYSIS OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY COMPARED TO  PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY WITH STENT IN DIABETIC PATIENTS Background: Diabetic patients are a group of primary interest in the study of myocardial revascularization. Aim: To compare coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) and percutaneous angioplasty with stents (PCI-S) in diabetic patients with coronary three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease. Material and methods: Meta-analysis of MEDLINE randomized controlled studies comparing CABG and PCI-S in diabetic patients. The primary outcome measure was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE), death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and coronary re-intervention. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACCE.  Results: Three studies comparing CABG and PCI-S met the inclusion criteria. One thousand sixty two patients were studied: 565 in the CABG group and 597 in the PCI-S group. At one year follow up MACCE occurred in 24.9 and 12.7% of patients in  PCI-S and CABG groups, respectively (Odds ratio (OR) 2.27; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.66 - 3.09). There were no differences in death or myocardial infarction. Strokes were less common in the PCI-S group (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 -  0.68) and coronary re-intervention was required with higher frequency in the PCI-S group (OR 5.32, 95% CI 3.27 – 8.67). Conclusions: In diabetic patients with three-vessel coronary disease or left main coronary artery, revascularization with CABG had significantly less MACCE at one year than those treated with PCI-S. Stroke frequency was higher in CABG, coronary re-intervention was higher in PCI-S. These results must be interpreted cautiously.es-ES
dc.languageen
dc.publisherRevista Médica de Chilees-ES
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/1762/3898
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/1762/3900
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/1762/3901
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/1762/4044
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/1762/4045
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/1762/4046
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/1762/4914
dc.sourceRevista Médica de Chile; Vol. 140, núm. 5 (2012): MAYO 2012es-ES
dc.source0034-9887
dc.subject(Rev Med Chile…) (Key-words: Angioplasty; Coronary artery bypass; Coronary artery disease)es-ES
dc.titleCirugía de revascularización miocárdica versus angioplastía coronaria con stent en enfermedad de tres vasos y/o tronco común izquierdo en diabéticos: meta-análisis de estudios aleatorios.es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typees-ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record