Show simple item record

TYPOLOGIES AND ARGUMENTS ABOUT THE USE OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AMONG PEOPLE LIVING IN SANTIAGO, CHILE.

Tipologías y Argumentos en torno a las Técnicas de Reproducción Asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile.

dc.contributoren-US
dc.contributorUniversidad Diego Portaleses-ES
dc.contributorFondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologíaes-ES
dc.creatorHerrera, Florencia; Universidad Diego Portales
dc.creatorTeitelboim, Berta; Universidad Diego Portales
dc.creatorZegers-Hochschild, Fernando; Universidad Diego Portales
dc.date2015-11-27
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-11T18:28:03Z
dc.date.available2019-11-11T18:28:03Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/view/4316
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/111409
dc.descriptionBackground: Assisted reproductive technologies still generate debate about ethical moral and religious issues. Aim: To analyze the opinions of the general public about the use of assisted reproduction technology (ART). Material and methods: This analysis used the information gathered in a survey about human reproduction and modern reproduction technologies applied to a random sample of 1,500 volunteers aged 18 to 65 years, living in Santiago, Chile. Also, data from 25 structured interviews and six focal groups of eight participants each was used. To typify opinions concerning the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), a multiple correspondence analysis was undertaken. Results: People that support ART are non-religious young people of medium-high socioeconomic level. The arguments most commonly used by people to justify their positions about ART are the right to have children, the protection of kinship, that ART implies commercialization and manipulation of human life, the need to obey God's will, and the autonomy of informed and educated adults. Conclusions: The study allows us to understand in more complex ways the positions about ART. Chile does not have a legislation that regulates the use of ART. Generating information on the public opinion about these techniques we hope to contribute to the debate about the access and regulation of new reproductive technologies in Chile.en-US
dc.descriptionBackground: Assisted reproductive technologies still generate debate about ethical moral and religious issues. Aim: To analyze the opinions of the general public about the use of assisted reproduction technology (ART). Material and methods: This analysis used the information gathered in a survey about human reproduction and modern reproduction technologies applied to a random sample of 1,500 volunteers aged 18 to 65 years, living in Santiago, Chile. Also, data from 25 structured interviews and six focal groups of eight participants each was used. To typify opinions concerning the use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART), a multiple correspondence analysis was undertaken. Results: People that support ART are non-religious young people of medium-high socioeconomic level. The arguments most commonly used by people to justify their positions about ART are the right to have children, the protection of kinship, that ART implies commercialization and manipulation of human life, the need to obey God's will, and the autonomy of informed and educated adults. Conclusions: The study allows us to understand in more complex ways the positions about ART. Chile does not have a legislation that regulates the use of ART. Generating information on the public opinion about these techniques we hope to contribute to the debate about the access and regulation of new reproductive technologies in Chile.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherRevista Médica de Chilees-ES
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/view/4316/1673
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/19017
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/19018
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/19019
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/19020
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/19119
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/20076
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/20077
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/20078
dc.relationhttp://www.revistamedicadechile.cl/ojs/index.php/rmedica/article/downloadSuppFile/4316/20079
dc.sourceRevista Médica de Chile; Vol. 143, núm. 12 (2015): DICIEMBRE 2015es-ES
dc.source0034-9887
dc.subjectFertilization; Health surveys; Infertilityen-US
dc.subjectFertilization; Health surveys; Infertilityes-ES
dc.titleTYPOLOGIES AND ARGUMENTS ABOUT THE USE OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES AMONG PEOPLE LIVING IN SANTIAGO, CHILE.en-US
dc.titleTipologías y Argumentos en torno a las Técnicas de Reproducción Asistida en habitantes de Santiago de Chile.es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typees-ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record