Show simple item record

dc.creatorHaidar, Ziyad
dc.creatorNoujeim, Ziad
dc.date2019-08-07
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-29T13:34:39Z
dc.date.available2020-10-29T13:34:39Z
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/journal_of_oral_research/article/view/1004
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/155752
dc.descriptionPrécis - During basic and specialized training, we’re often told that socket preservation is standard of care. Today, we wonder, is it? If not, why not? We were also voiced much about atraumatic extraction and the simple technique of socket grafting, especially in areas where bone and soft tissue shrinkage would impede proper pontic aesthetics and implant placement. What about retained roots, trauma to other structures, damage to developing (underlying) permanent teeth, and need for tension-less flaps at suture line? Are dentists following? Do we in the smile zone, at least? Besides, why are we still questioned, almost on a regular basis, by residents as well as fellow clinicians whether to irrigate or not, post-extraction? Concerns, we thought to address celebrating the end of 2017, or in better words, ~120 years since coining the term “ dry socket” for the first time.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Concepción, Facultad de Odontologíaes-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.udec.cl/index.php/journal_of_oral_research/article/view/1004/1701
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2018 Universidad de Concepciónes-ES
dc.sourceJournal of Oral Research; Vol. 7 No. 1: January; 8-10en-US
dc.sourceJournal of Oral Research; Vol. 7 Núm. 1: Enero; 8-10es-ES
dc.source0719-2479
dc.source0719-2460
dc.subjectFibrinolytic Alveolitises-ES
dc.titleFibrinolytic Alveolitis, since 1896: Contemporary Concepts and Quandarieses-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record