The Legal Nature and Features of the Action Established on Article 669 Paragraph 1° of the Chilean Civil Code
La naturaleza jurídica y caracteres de la acción del artículo 669 inciso 1° del Código Civil chileno
| dc.creator | Núñez Cádiz, Ricardo | |
| dc.date | 2021-05-03 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-01T12:21:50Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-06-01T12:21:50Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://lals.uai.cl/index.php/rld/article/view/82 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.15691/0719-9112Vol8a5 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/167189 | |
| dc.description | In the present work the legal nature of the action established on article 669 paragraph 1° of the Chilean Civil Code is explored; even though it seems to be agreement as to what a restitutionary reimbursement is, this is not asserted enough, which generates difficulties at the judicial level. Indeed, concerning the action of reimbursement granted by article 669 paragraph 1°, no distinction has been drawn between the restitutionary and compensatory character of the norm. Having an unduly property allocation taken place, the principle of unjustified enrichment imposes the obligation of restituting, thus not being required a correlative impoverishment in order to claim the restitutionary reimbursement, since the action is not aimed at compensating the impoverished, but to recovered the unduly assigned enrichment, this way, regarding the studied action the stress muss shift from the amount of the impoverishment to the effective amount of the enrichment, so as not to apply the compensatory logic to the restitutionary reimbursement. | en-US |
| dc.description | En el presente trabajo se explora la naturaleza jurídica de la acción del artículo 669 inciso 1° del Código Civil chileno; aunque parece haber acuerdo respecto que se trata de un reembolso restitutorio, no se afirma lo suficiente, lo que genera ciertas dificultades a nivel judicial. En efecto, en la acción de reembolso otorgada en el inciso 1º del artículo 669 no se ha distinguido en modo alguno el carácter restitutorio o indemnizatorio de la norma. Habiendo una atribución patrimonial indebida, el principio de enriquecimiento injustificado impone la obligación de restituir, por lo que no debe exigirse un empobrecimiento correlativo para reclamar el reembolso restitutorio, ya que no se busca indemnizar al empobrecido, sino recuperar el enriquecimiento atribuido indebidamente. De este modo, en la acción estudiada el acento debe trasladarse del monto del empobrecimiento al monto efectivo del enriquecimiento, a fin de no aplicar la lógica indemnizatoria al reembolso restitutorio. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez | es-ES |
| dc.relation | http://lals.uai.cl/index.php/rld/article/view/82/105 | |
| dc.relation | http://lals.uai.cl/index.php/rld/article/view/82/106 | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2021 Latin American Legal Studies | es-ES |
| dc.source | Latin American Legal Studies; Vol. 8 (2021); 207-265 | en-US |
| dc.source | Latin American Legal Studies; Vol. 8 (2021); 207-265 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 0719-9112 | |
| dc.source | 0719-9104 | |
| dc.title | The Legal Nature and Features of the Action Established on Article 669 Paragraph 1° of the Chilean Civil Code | en-US |
| dc.title | La naturaleza jurídica y caracteres de la acción del artículo 669 inciso 1° del Código Civil chileno | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Latin American Legal Studies
\([0-9]{4}\)