“An illegal act, susceptible of annulment, does not always give the right to repair”, comments on the judgment of the Supreme Court, 04-26-2021, Rol 85.305-2020
“Una medida ilegal, susceptible de anulación, no da siempre derecho a reparación”, comentarios al fallo de la Corte Suprema del 26.04.2021, Rol 85.305-2020
| dc.creator | Matheus Hidalgo, Mayerlin | |
| dc.date | 2021-12-23 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-04T15:29:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-04T15:29:54Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.uautonoma.cl/index.php/rjyd/article/view/1688 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.32457/rjyd.v4i3.1688 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/184990 | |
| dc.description | The purpose of this paper is to comment on the Supreme Court decision of April 26, 2021, Rol 85.305-2020. In particular, to criticize the current understanding of the Administration’s liability and the lack of service as an imputation factor, taking into account that such understanding allows the existence of activities of the Administration that, although causing damages, do not entail responsibility for the Administration or the obligation to repair them, as in the case of administrative acts declared illegals. | en-US |
| dc.description | Este trabajo tiene como objeto comentar el fallo de la Corte Suprema del 26.04.2021, Rol 85.305-2020. En especial, hacer una crítica al entendimiento actual de la responsabilidad patrimonial de la Administración y de la falta de servicio como factor de imputación, teniendo en cuenta que tal entendimiento permite que existan actividades de la Administración que aun causando daños no comportan responsabilidad para esta ni la obligación de repararlos, como sucede con los actos administrativos declarados ilegales. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad Autónoma de CHile | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.uautonoma.cl/index.php/rjyd/article/view/1688/1206 | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2021 Mayerlin Matheus Hidalgo | es-ES |
| dc.rights | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Justicia & Derecho; Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): segundo semestre 2021; 1-10 | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Justicia & Derecho; Vol. 4 Núm. 3 (2021): segundo semestre 2021; 1-10 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 0719-9392 | |
| dc.source | 10.32457/rjyd.v4i3 | |
| dc.subject | responsabilidad | es-ES |
| dc.subject | falta de servicio | es-ES |
| dc.subject | acto ilegal | es-ES |
| dc.subject | liability | en-US |
| dc.subject | lack of service | en-US |
| dc.subject | illegal act | en-US |
| dc.title | “An illegal act, susceptible of annulment, does not always give the right to repair”, comments on the judgment of the Supreme Court, 04-26-2021, Rol 85.305-2020 | en-US |
| dc.title | “Una medida ilegal, susceptible de anulación, no da siempre derecho a reparación”, comentarios al fallo de la Corte Suprema del 26.04.2021, Rol 85.305-2020 | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Revista Justicia & Derecho
\([0-9]{4}\)