Show simple item record

dc.creatorArai, Koki
dc.date2010-11-08
dc.identifierhttps://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/art170
dc.identifier10.4067/S0718-27242010000400001
dc.descriptionThis paper analyzes the patent examination and litigation process in terms of a simple Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium model, and interprets the results in line with real pro-patent trends in the US and other countries. Each country’s pro-patent policy option is different from the other because of reflecting its own path-dependent patent situation. That is, when a country adopts an easy patent policy (a pro-patent policy), firms in the country gain larger payoffs in the short term. Hence, every country seeks to adopt an easy patent policy. However, the easy patent policy undermines the true invention incentive. In this situation, it is difficult for any country to escape the problem, depending on the historical inertia.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFacultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Alberto Hurtadoen-US
dc.relationhttps://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/art170/594
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2010 Journal of Technology Management & Innovationen-US
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0en-US
dc.sourceJournal of Technology Management & Innovation; Vol. 5 No. 4 (2010); 1-9en-US
dc.sourceJournal of Technology Management & Innovation; Vol. 5 Núm. 4 (2010); 1-9es-ES
dc.source0718-2724
dc.subjectpatent qualityen-US
dc.subjectpro-patenten-US
dc.subjectPerfect Bayesian Equilibriumen-US
dc.titlePatent Quality and Pro-patent Policyen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typeArtículo revisado por paresen-US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record