Show simple item record

On the negative social effects of exaggerated distrust and paranoid cognition

dc.creatorGonzález-Fernández, Rodrigo
dc.date2022-12-31
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T18:17:30Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T18:17:30Z
dc.identifierhttps://cintademoebio.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/69573
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/220744
dc.descriptionIn view of Kramer’s theory about paranoid cognition, this paper examines how exaggerated distrust and such cognition produce important negative effects upon social reality. The first section deals with Searle’s theory of social reality, and how it is basically explained in terms of one world of physical particles and groups of intentional agents performing “we” actions. The aim of this section is to show that the “we” actions of collective intentionality allow fundamental social practices, namely, those related to institutions. Looking at trust, cooperation, and collective intentionality, the second section examines in what sense these three elements form the triad of human civilization. Finally, the last section analyses which negative effects exaggerated distrust and Kramer’s paranoid cognition have upon the Searlean social reality: both, which break off cooperative relations and solemn pacts, end up disrupting the triad.en-US
dc.descriptionIn view of Kramer’s theory about paranoid cognition, this paper examines how exaggerated distrustand such cognition produce important negative effects upon social reality. The first section dealswith Searle’s theory of social reality, and how it is basically explained in terms of one world ofphysical particles and groups of intentional agents performing “we” actions. The aim of this sectionis to show that the “we” actions of collective intentionality allow fundamental social practices,namely, those related to institutions. Looking at trust, cooperation, and collective intentionality, thesecond section examines in what sense these three elements form the triad of human civilization.Finally, the last section analyses which negative effects exaggerated distrust and Kramer’s paranoidcognition have upon the Searlean social reality: both, which break off cooperative relations andsolemn pacts, end up disrupting the triad.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias Socialeses-ES
dc.relationhttps://cintademoebio.uchile.cl/index.php/CDM/article/view/69573/72351
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2023 Cinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Socialeses-ES
dc.sourceCinta de Moebio. Revista de Epistemología de Ciencias Sociales; Núm. 75 (2022): Diciembre; 159-171es-ES
dc.source0717-554X
dc.source0717-554X
dc.subjecttrusten-US
dc.subjectdistrusten-US
dc.subjectcooperationen-US
dc.subjectcollective intentionalityen-US
dc.subjectparanoid cognitionen-US
dc.subjecttrustes-ES
dc.subjectdistrustes-ES
dc.subjectcooperationes-ES
dc.subjectcollective intentionalityes-ES
dc.subjectparanoide cognitiones-ES
dc.titleOn the negative social effects of exaggerated distrust and paranoid cognitionen-US
dc.titleOn the negative social effects of exaggerated distrust and paranoid cognitiones-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record