Show simple item record

dc.creatorPalhares, Dario
dc.creatorSquinca, Flávia
dc.creatorRodrigues, Antônio Carlos
dc.date2016-06-18
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-01T20:12:53Z
dc.date.available2019-04-01T20:12:53Z
dc.identifierhttps://actabioethica.uchile.cl/index.php/AB/article/view/41721
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2287
dc.descriptionSports Medicine comprises two branches: one, related to professional athletes and the other, related to the general population vis a vis sports and physical activity. The bioethical conflicts involving professional athletes are different from those of amateur practitioners. There is a constant deliberation related to the requirement of medical evaluation before admission to a gym. There are regional laws that make the medical certificate an obligatory document. It is observed that in the creation of these laws, the arguments are guided by a way to transfer responsibility from the gym to the physician who has attended the client. In a sense, the laws that indiscriminately require medical certificates subvert the ethics of the medical practice because the medical officer is not capable to assure that a given patient has no medical issue; instead the medical work is to try to identify the cause to a complaint. The gyms provide clients with orientation and supervision by providing them with qualified professionals. Although the need for medical certificates for everybody is unethical, a detailed medical evaluation is needed for gym clients who may present clinical manifestations during exercise or have some specific clinical conditions.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Chile. Centro Interdisciplinario de Estudios en Bioéticaen-US
dc.relationhttps://actabioethica.uchile.cl/index.php/AB/article/view/41721/43223
dc.sourceActa Bioethica; Vol 22 No 1 (2016): Salud Mental Global: perspectivas socioculturales y éticasen-US
dc.sourceActa Bioethica; Vol 22 No 1 (2016): Salud Mental Global: perspectivas socioculturales y éticases-ES
dc.source1726-569X
dc.source0717-5906
dc.titleBioethical debate regarding gyms’ need for medical certificates for amateur sportsmenen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record