• Journals
  • Discipline
  • Indexed
  • Institutions
  • About
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Revista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Revista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction
  • View Item

A comparative study between linear regression analysis and various codes for predicting the mechanical characteristics of poly-mer concrete using R-sand and M-sand

Author
K, Candassamy

J, Sreerambabu

P, Sasikumar

Full text
https://revistadelaconstruccion.uc.cl/index.php/RDLC/article/view/72407
10.7764/RDLC.23.1.129
Abstract
Numerous research studies have concentrated on advancing a sustainable construction industry through innovative concrete methods and materials. In this context, the present research specifically investigates polymer concrete, utilizing both River sand (R-sand) and Manufacturing sand (M-sand). The polymer content was incorporated into the concrete mix based on the weight of the cement, with varying percentages specifically 2%, 4%, 5%, 6%, and 8%. A slump cone test was conducted to assess the workability of the polymer concrete. Based on experimental studies, the optimal polymer percentage was determined to be 5%. This optimal dosage of polymer content significantly improved the mechanical properties of the polymer concrete. The Compressive Strength (CS), Split Tensile Strength (STS), Flexural Strength (FS), and Modulus of Elasticity (ME) were evaluated at both 7 and 28 days. When using R-sand, the mechanical properties of CS, STS, and FS increased by 13.65%, 12.20%, and 11.42%, respectively. Conversely, employing M-sand led to even greater improvements in strength properties: 19.18% for CS, 12.54% for STS, and 11.67% for FS. Based on the experimental results, the strength properties of polymer concrete M-sand mixes outperformed the R-sand mixes. Linear regression analysis and various codes were employed to predict the strength properties of CS, STS, FS and ME. The regression analysis and various codes successfully forecasted the strength properties of polymer concrete, with the predicted results closely correlated with the experimental results. Based on experimental investigations, the determined mix proportions are recommended for practical applications in various environmental conditions.Numerous research studies have concentrated on advancing a sustainable construction industry through innovative concrete methods and materials. In this context, the present research specifically investigates polymer concrete, utilizing both River sand (R-sand) and Manufacturing sand (M-sand). The polymer content was incorporated into the concrete mix based on the weight of the cement, with varying percentages specifically 2%, 4%, 5%, 6%, and 8%. A slump cone test was conducted to assess the workability of the polymer concrete. Based on experimental studies, the optimal polymer percentage was determined to be 5%. This optimal dosage of polymer content significantly improved the mechanical properties of the polymer concrete. The Compressive Strength (CS), Split Tensile Strength (STS), Flexural Strength (FS), and Modulus of Elasticity (ME) were evaluated at both 7 and 28 days. When using R-sand, the mechanical properties of CS, STS, and FS increased by 13.65%, 12.20%, and 11.42%, respectively. Conversely, employing M-sand led to even greater improvements in strength properties: 19.18% for CS, 12.54% for STS, and 11.67% for FS. Based on the experimental results, the strength properties of polymer concrete M-sand mixes outperformed the R-sand mixes. Linear regression analysis and various codes were employed to predict the strength properties of CS, STS, FS and ME. The regression analysis and various codes successfully forecasted the strength properties of polymer concrete, with the predicted results closely correlated with the experimental results. Based on experimental investigations, the determined mix proportions are recommended for practical applications in various environmental conditions.
Metadata
Show full item record
Discipline
Artes, Arquitectura y UrbanismoCiencias Agrarias, Forestales y VeterinariasCiencias Exactas y NaturalesCiencias SocialesDerechoEconomía y AdministraciónFilosofía y HumanidadesIngenieríaMedicinaMultidisciplinarias
Institutions
Universidad de ChileUniversidad Católica de ChileUniversidad de Santiago de ChileUniversidad de ConcepciónUniversidad Austral de ChileUniversidad Católica de ValparaísoUniversidad del Bio BioUniversidad de ValparaísoUniversidad Católica del Nortemore

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister
Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas (SISIB) - Universidad de Chile
© 2019 Dspace - Modificado por SISIB