Show simple item record

Review of Research on Management Innovation and Innovation Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

Review of Research on Management Innovation and Innovation Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

dc.creatorCiptono, Wakhid Slamet
dc.creatorUtomo, Hargo
dc.creatorNoviasari, Tria Putri
dc.creatorPampa Kumalaningrum, Maria
dc.date2024-07-11
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-19T19:56:41Z
dc.date.available2025-05-19T19:56:41Z
dc.identifierhttps://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/4076
dc.identifier10.4067/S0718-27242024000200100
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/253065
dc.descriptionMuch research regarding innovation management (IM) and management innovation (MI) were used interchangeably, even though both terms referred to two different meanings. This, in turn, causes obscurity in an attempt to clearly understand the essence of each term. This study is carried out with the objective to map the development of the research of IM and MI over the years simultaneously and separately using systematic search and bibliometric analysis. Our results discover that the publication for both terms increased over the years. Our general results show that most encountered keywords are mostly different for both terms. However, it then discovered that the terms ‘knowledge management’, which is associated with ‘organizational learning’, appeared in the top 5 most encountered keywords for both terms. This finding opens up new insights that deserve deeper investigation regarding the grand concept and its mechanism of action in the future.en-US
dc.descriptionMuch research regarding innovation management (IM) and management innovation (MI) were used interchangeably, even though both terms referred to two different meanings. This, in turn, causes obscurity in an attempt to clearly understand the essence of each term. This study is carried out with the objective to map the development of the research of IM and MI over the years simultaneously and separately using systematic search and bibliometric analysis. Our results discover that the publication for both terms increased over the years. Our general results show that most encountered keywords are mostly different for both terms. However, it then discovered that the terms ‘knowledge management’, which is associated with ‘organizational learning’, appeared in the top 5 most encountered keywords for both terms. This finding opens up new insights that deserve deeper investigation regarding the grand concept and its mechanism of action in the future.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFacultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Alberto Hurtadoen-US
dc.relationhttps://www.jotmi.org/index.php/GT/article/view/4076/1548
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2023 Journal of Technology Management & Innovationen-US
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0en-US
dc.sourceJournal of Technology Management & Innovation; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024); 100-111en-US
dc.sourceJournal of Technology Management & Innovation; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2024); 100-111es-ES
dc.source0718-2724
dc.subjectinnovationen-US
dc.subjectinnovation managementen-US
dc.subjectmanagement innovationen-US
dc.subjectbibliometric analysisen-US
dc.titleReview of Research on Management Innovation and Innovation Management: A Bibliometric Analysisen-US
dc.titleReview of Research on Management Innovation and Innovation Management: A Bibliometric Analysises-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record