Show simple item record

dc.creatorMANCILLA GAMBOA, JUAN CLAUDIO
dc.date2025-01-10
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-19T20:20:53Z
dc.date.available2025-05-19T20:20:53Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.jcchems.com/index.php/JCCHEMS/article/view/2637
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/253114
dc.descriptionTraditional chemical methods, such as HPLC and AAS, are sensitive and selective for arsenic speciation but require complex sample preparation and are costly. In contrast, electrochemical methods, like voltammetry, offer a faster, more sensitive, and cost-effective analysis with a simpler sample preparation, highlighting their sample size and portability. The choice between both approaches depends on the specific needs of the analysis and the available resources.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherSociedad Chilena de Químicaen-US
dc.relationhttp://www.jcchems.com/index.php/JCCHEMS/article/view/2637/662
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2025 JCChemSen-US
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0en-US
dc.sourceJournal of the Chilean Chemical Society; Vol 69 No 2 (2024): Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society; 6135-6139en-US
dc.source0717-9707
dc.source0717-9324
dc.subjectElectrochemistryen-US
dc.subjectSensorsen-US
dc.subjectArsenicen-US
dc.subjectSpeciationen-US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten-US
dc.titleComparison of Arsenic Speciation Techniques: Focus on Chemical and Electrochemical Methodsen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record