Show simple item record

Income distribution versus growth. Theory and empirical evidence

dc.creatorLetelier, Leonardo
dc.date2016-05-09
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-02T13:58:47Z
dc.date.available2019-04-02T13:58:47Z
dc.identifierhttps://estudiosdeeconomia.uchile.cl/index.php/EDE/article/view/40988
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/2813
dc.descriptionThis paper focuses on the relationship between income distribution and growth. It first addresses the theoretical contributions to this issue and secondly it analyzes the empirical evidence available. Three important steps can be distinguished in the theoretical debate. The first one was initiated by D. Ricardo and it deals with factor Income Distribution, a thoroughly relevant theory at the time. The second important step was given by the early neo-Keynesians and the view of the Development Economists, Kuznets being the most prominent representative. Finally the convergence of the endogenous growth models and the so-called new political economy, provides a new interpretation of this economic phenomena. Regarding the empirical evidence, though most of the studies tend to confirm the presence of a significant effect of ID on growth, the existence of a Kuznets type relationship has been questioned.en-US
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherDepartamento de Economía - Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad de Chile.en-US
dc.relationhttps://estudiosdeeconomia.uchile.cl/index.php/EDE/article/view/40988/43714
dc.sourceEstudios de Economía; Vol 22 No 2 (1995): December; pp. 389-424en-US
dc.sourceEstudios de Economía; Vol 22 No 2 (1995): December; pp. 389-424es-ES
dc.source0718-5286
dc.source0304-2758
dc.titleIncome distribution versus growth. Theory and empirical evidenceen-US
dc.titleIncome distribution versus growth. Theory and empirical evidencees-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record