Show simple item record

dc.creatorWILLSON,MARY F
dc.creatorARMESTO,JUAN J
dc.date2006-06-01
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-25T12:53:34Z
dc.date.available2019-04-25T12:53:34Z
dc.identifierhttps://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0716-078X2006000200013
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/62789
dc.descriptionIn recent years natural history has been derided by some scientists as an old-fashion endeavor that does not follow the model of "hard" science and therefore should be considered "dead" and replaced by modern ecology, evolutionary biology, and conservation biology. We contend that natural history has much to offer to contemporary scientists and that it has a primary role in the creative process of generating novel hypotheses and designing significant field experiments and observations
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageen
dc.publisherSociedad de Biología de Chile
dc.relation10.4067/S0716-078X2006000200013
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceRevista chilena de historia natural v.79 n.2 2006
dc.subjectecology
dc.subjectnaturalists
dc.subjectbiologists
dc.subjectbasic science
dc.titleIs natural history really dead?: Toward the rebirth of natural history


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record