Show simple item record

dc.contributoren-US
dc.creatorCarpio de los Pinos, Antonio José; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
dc.creatorGonzález García, María de las Nieves; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
dc.date2017-05-02
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T12:20:07Z
dc.date.available2019-05-03T12:20:07Z
dc.identifierhttp://revistadelaconstruccion.uc.cl/index.php/rdlc/article/view/705
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/84077
dc.descriptionDOI: 10.7764/RDLC.16.1.104This paper studies the possibility of using the following occupational risk assessment methods for construction works: INSHT, ANACT, THREP, SHERPA, RNUR, EVENT TREE, LEST, FINE, ERGONOMIC ANALYSIS and PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS. Of these methods, INSHT, ANACT, RNUR and FINE have been selected with the objective of applying them to real building works, in order to determine the discrepancies in the results obtained compared to the risks analyzed. The results make it possible to ascertain the types of risk which each method most reliably detects, there being methods which are not able to detect extreme or very low risks. It is concluded that if a single risk assessment method is used, the results do not entirely reflect reality, as such it is necessary to establish a new risk assessment methodology for construction works.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE CHILEen-US
dc.relationhttp://revistadelaconstruccion.uc.cl/index.php/rdlc/article/view/705/167
dc.relationhttp://revistadelaconstruccion.uc.cl/index.php/rdlc/article/downloadSuppFile/705/461
dc.sourceRevista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction; Vol 16, No 1 (2017): Revista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction; 104-114en-US
dc.source0718-915X
dc.source0717-7925
dc.subjecten-US
dc.subjectPrevention, safety at work, methodology, risk assessment, constructionen-US
dc.titleCritical analysis of risk assessment methods applied to construction worksen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Articleen-US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record