Show simple item record

dc.creatorLópez Astorga,Miguel
dc.date2015-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T14:23:24Z
dc.date.available2019-05-03T14:23:24Z
dc.identifierhttps://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-23762015000200009
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/90398
dc.descriptionThe mental models theory and the mental logic theory are two alternative theories trying to explain, describe, and predict human reasoning. Both of them are consistent with most the experimental results reported in cognitive science literature. Therefore, it is hard to decide which is the correct one. In this paper, I argue that the predictions of both theories concerning the conditionals with disjunctions embedded into their antecedents are different, and that certain results that can be found in the literature seems to support the predictions of the mental logic theory about this kind of conditionals.
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageen
dc.publisherUniversidad de Talca. Instituto de Estudios Humanísticos
dc.relation10.4067/S0718-23762015000200009
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceUniversum (Talca) v.30 n.2 2015
dc.subjectConditional
dc.subjectdisjunction
dc.subjectformal rules
dc.subjectmental logic
dc.subjectmental models
dc.titleTHE CASE OF THE CONDITIONALS WITH DISJUNCTIONS EMBEDDED INTO THEIR ANTECEDENTS: MENTAL LOGIC VERSUS SEMANTIC MODELS


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record