Show simple item record

dc.creatorSchindler,David C
dc.date2009-01-01
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T14:26:19Z
dc.date.available2019-05-03T14:26:19Z
dc.identifierhttps://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0049-34492009000100017
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/90845
dc.descriptionThis article compares the accounts Edmund Husserl and Hans Urs von Balthasar offer of the ultimate philosophical act: the transcendental reduction and contemplation of the fourfold difference, respectively. It argues that Husserl's method precludes from the outset the raising of the question of being, and that as a consequence, all four of the distinctions that Balthasar describes must ultimately collapse in his phenomenology. An adequate response to Husserl must attend, at least implicitly, to the whole of the fourfold difference in all of its dimensions. The article concludes with a brief reflection on the significance of metaphysics for Christianity and the significance of Christianity for metaphysics.
dc.formattext/html
dc.languageen
dc.publisherPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Teología
dc.relation10.4067/S0049-34492009000100017
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceTeología y vida v.50 n.1-2 2009
dc.subjectBalthasar
dc.subjectHusserl
dc.subjectPhenomenology
dc.subjectMetaphysics
dc.subjectBeing
dc.titleMetaphysics within the Limits of Phenomenology: Balthasar and Husserl on the Nature of the Philosophical Act


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record