Show simple item record

Sumando límites a la reconstrucción argumentativa: el caso del gusto en la argumentación

dc.creatorMejía, Daniel
dc.date2020-12-30
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-18T18:51:52Z
dc.date.available2021-01-18T18:51:52Z
dc.identifierhttp://www.cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/363
dc.identifier10.32995/cogency.v12i2.363
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/162224
dc.descriptionThis paper questions the use of the argumentative reconstruction technique as a criterion for identifying arguments. To perform this, I stress a type of argument that appeals to taste. I proceed as follows: first, I relate such a technique to the ways in which pragma-dialectics and informal logic have defined argumentation. Second, I present some borderline cases to reconstruction technique such as argumentation through directives, expressives and commissives speech acts, narrative argumentation, and visual argumentation. Third, I add to these cases that of an argumentation that appeals to taste by analyzing a dialogue. Fourth, I conclude the article by offering reasons to study cases such as the one presented and by introducing some problems derived from the present study.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherFaculty of Psychology, Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chileen-US
dc.relationhttp://www.cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/363/153
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en-US
dc.sourceCogency; Vol 12 No 2 (2020): Summer 2020; 107-137en-US
dc.sourceCogency; Vol 12 No 2 (2020): Summer 2020; 107-137es-ES
dc.source0718-8285
dc.source10.32995/cogency.v12i2
dc.titleAdding limits to argumentative reconstruction: the case of taste in argumentationen-US
dc.titleSumando límites a la reconstrucción argumentativa: el caso del gusto en la argumentaciónes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record