Show simple item record

Treating Kuhn's Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas.

Treating Kuhn's Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas.

dc.creatorZenker, Frank
dc.date2009-08-26
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-30T15:52:40Z
dc.date.available2021-12-30T15:52:40Z
dc.identifierhttps://cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/206
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/177436
dc.publisherFaculty of Psychology, Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chilees-ES
dc.sourceCogency; Vol. 1 No. 1: Winter 2009en-US
dc.sourceCogency; Vol. 1 Núm. 1: Winter 2009es-ES
dc.source0719-9430
dc.source0718-8285
dc.titleTreating Kuhn's Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas.en-US
dc.titleTreating Kuhn's Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas.es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record