How universal generalization works according to natural reason
How universal generalization works according to natural reason
| dc.creator | Hodge, Kyle | |
| dc.date | 2022-01-26 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-28T15:20:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-04-28T15:20:55Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/366 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.32995/cogency.v13i2.366 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/182027 | |
| dc.description | Universal Generalization, if it is not the most poorly understood inference rule in natural deduction, then it is the least well explained or justified. The inference rule is, prima facie, quite ambitious: on the basis of a fact established of one thing, I may infer that the fact holds of every thing in the class to which the one belongs—a class which may contain indefinitely many things. How can such an inference be made with any confidence as to its validity or ability to preserve truth from premise to conclusion? My goal in this paper is to explain how Universal Generalization works in a way that makes sense of its ability to preserve truth. In doing so, I shall review common accounts of Universal Generalization and explain why they are inadequate or are explanatorily unsatisfying. Happily, my account makes no ontological or epistemological presumptions and therefore should be compatible with whichever ontological or epistemological schemes the reader prefers. | en-US |
| dc.description | Universal Generalization, if it is not the most poorly understood inference rule in natural deduction, then it is the least well explained or justified. The inference rule is, prima facie, quite ambitious: on the basis of a fact established of one thing, I may infer that the fact holds of every thing in the class to which the one belongs—a class which may contain indefinitely many things. How can such an inference be made with any confidence as to its validity or ability to preserve truth from premise to conclusion? My goal in this paper is to explain how Universal Generalization works in a way that makes sense of its ability to preserve truth. In doing so, I shall review common accounts of Universal Generalization and explain why they are inadequate or are explanatorily unsatisfying. Happily, my account makes no ontological or epistemological presumptions and therefore should be compatible with whichever ontological or epistemological schemes the reader prefers. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Faculty of Psychology, Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/366/166 | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2022 Kyle Hodge | es-ES |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Cogency; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): Summer 2021; 138-148 | en-US |
| dc.source | Cogency; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2021): Verano 2021; 138-148 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 0719-9430 | |
| dc.source | 0718-8285 | |
| dc.source | 10.32995/cogency.v13i2 | |
| dc.subject | informal logic | en-US |
| dc.subject | logic | en-US |
| dc.subject | reasoning | en-US |
| dc.subject | universal generalization | en-US |
| dc.subject | rules of inference | en-US |
| dc.title | How universal generalization works according to natural reason | en-US |
| dc.title | How universal generalization works according to natural reason | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |