• Journals
  • Discipline
  • Indexed
  • Institutions
  • About
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez
  • Literatura y Lingüística
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Universidad Católica Silva Henríquez
  • Literatura y Lingüística
  • View Item

Acquiring a scholar’s voice: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writing

Acquiring a scholar’s voice: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writing: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writing

Author
Gollin Kies, Sandra

Lambert, Olga

Full text
http://ediciones.ucsh.cl/ojs/index.php/lyl/article/view/3145
10.29344/0717621X.46.3145
Abstract
Abstract We report preliminary results of a mixed-methods longitudinal study of academic writing by graduate students writing in English in Vietnam.  The research involves Vietnamese EFL teachers (n=62) taking a 2-year MA Linguistics (TESOL) program delivered in hybrid mode.  The program, jointly taught by an American private university and a large public university in Vietnam, uses an innovative scaffolded thesis model developed by the researchers. In program entry surveys, vocabulary was mentioned most often as a significant challenge for academic writing. We compared the vocabulary that our students used in early and late drafts of their theses against two reference corpora: The graduate level linguistics subcorpus of the BAWE corpus of student academic writing and COCAA 2010-12.  Data from the first drafts of the introduction, discussion and conclusion sections shows the Vietnamese students compare favorably with both native and non-native students in the BAWE subcorpus in terms of lexical density measured as type to token ratio, but their use of both discipline-specific and “core academic” words is more limited in scope. Between drafts, the overall length of writing expanded by approximately 17% and students collectively added 302 word types including 25 core academic and 11 discipline specific. It is clear from our research that vocabulary cannot be disentangled completely from other aspects of academic writing such as lexical bundles, syntax, and cohesion. Our research will enhance writing pedagogy in EAP with suggestions for developing targeted and contextualized instruction in using academic vocabulary, and it will be of particular interest to instructors of advanced students writing in an EFL environment.  
 
We report preliminary results of a study of academic writing by graduate students writing in English in Vietnam, triangulating quantitative and qualitative data to gain insight into students’ perceptions of their writing and their actual performance. The research involves Vietnamese EFL teachers (n = 62) taking a 2-year MA Linguistics (TESOL) program delivered in hybrid mode. The program, jointly taught by an American private university and a large public university in Vietnam, uses an innovative scaffolded thesis model developed by the researchers. In program entry surveys, students mentioned vocabulary most often as a significant challenge for academic writing. In an attempt to quantify the extent of this perceived deficit, we compared the vocabulary that our students used in early and late drafts of their theses against two reference corpora: the graduate level linguistics subcorpus of the BAWE corpus of student academic writing and COCAA 2010-12. Data from the first drafts of the introduction, discussion and conclusion sections shows that the Vietnamese students compared favorably with both native and non-native students in the BAWE subcorpus in terms of lexical density measured as type to token ratio, but their use of both discipline-specific and “core academic” words was slightly more limited, and they relied more on repetition of the most common words in English. Between drafts, the overall length of writing expanded by approximately 17%, and students collectively added 302 word types, including 25 core academic and 11 discipline specific. The study suggests that vocabulary cannot be disentangled completely from other aspects of academic writing such as lexical bundles, syntax, and cohesion, and these require more investigation in advanced students writing in an EFL environment.
 
Metadata
Show full item record

Related items

Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.

  • Paraphrase Patterns of Expert Academic Writers: Implications for Writing Development, Writing Pedagogy, and Plagiarism Policies 

    Michiels, Paul; Kessler, Karyn; Rogers, Paul. Literatura y Linguí­stica; No. 46 (2022): Literatura y Lingüística; 153-189
  • A multicompetence perspective of hedging in second language academic writing 

    Alonso Alonso, Rosa. Onomázein ; No. 45: 2019; 58-78
  • The usage of anglicisms within the framework of Marketing academic vocabulary 

    López Zurita, Paloma. Onomázein ; No. 39: 2018; 114-139
Discipline
Artes, Arquitectura y UrbanismoCiencias Agrarias, Forestales y VeterinariasCiencias Exactas y NaturalesCiencias SocialesDerechoEconomía y AdministraciónFilosofía y HumanidadesIngenieríaMedicinaMultidisciplinarias
Institutions
Universidad de ChileUniversidad Católica de ChileUniversidad de Santiago de ChileUniversidad de ConcepciónUniversidad Austral de ChileUniversidad Católica de ValparaísoUniversidad del Bio BioUniversidad de ValparaísoUniversidad Católica del Nortemore

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister
Dirección de Servicios de Información y Bibliotecas (SISIB) - Universidad de Chile
© 2019 Dspace - Modificado por SISIB