Show simple item record

Acquiring a scholar’s voice: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writing

Acquiring a scholar’s voice: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writing: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writing

dc.creatorGollin Kies, Sandra
dc.creatorLambert, Olga
dc.date2023-02-13
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-09T18:34:52Z
dc.date.available2023-05-09T18:34:52Z
dc.identifierhttp://ediciones.ucsh.cl/ojs/index.php/lyl/article/view/3145
dc.identifier10.29344/0717621X.46.3145
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/225464
dc.descriptionAbstract We report preliminary results of a mixed-methods longitudinal study of academic writing by graduate students writing in English in Vietnam.  The research involves Vietnamese EFL teachers (n=62) taking a 2-year MA Linguistics (TESOL) program delivered in hybrid mode.  The program, jointly taught by an American private university and a large public university in Vietnam, uses an innovative scaffolded thesis model developed by the researchers. In program entry surveys, vocabulary was mentioned most often as a significant challenge for academic writing. We compared the vocabulary that our students used in early and late drafts of their theses against two reference corpora: The graduate level linguistics subcorpus of the BAWE corpus of student academic writing and COCAA 2010-12.  Data from the first drafts of the introduction, discussion and conclusion sections shows the Vietnamese students compare favorably with both native and non-native students in the BAWE subcorpus in terms of lexical density measured as type to token ratio, but their use of both discipline-specific and “core academic” words is more limited in scope. Between drafts, the overall length of writing expanded by approximately 17% and students collectively added 302 word types including 25 core academic and 11 discipline specific. It is clear from our research that vocabulary cannot be disentangled completely from other aspects of academic writing such as lexical bundles, syntax, and cohesion. Our research will enhance writing pedagogy in EAP with suggestions for developing targeted and contextualized instruction in using academic vocabulary, and it will be of particular interest to instructors of advanced students writing in an EFL environment.  en-US
dc.descriptionWe report preliminary results of a study of academic writing by graduate students writing in English in Vietnam, triangulating quantitative and qualitative data to gain insight into students’ perceptions of their writing and their actual performance. The research involves Vietnamese EFL teachers (n = 62) taking a 2-year MA Linguistics (TESOL) program delivered in hybrid mode. The program, jointly taught by an American private university and a large public university in Vietnam, uses an innovative scaffolded thesis model developed by the researchers. In program entry surveys, students mentioned vocabulary most often as a significant challenge for academic writing. In an attempt to quantify the extent of this perceived deficit, we compared the vocabulary that our students used in early and late drafts of their theses against two reference corpora: the graduate level linguistics subcorpus of the BAWE corpus of student academic writing and COCAA 2010-12. Data from the first drafts of the introduction, discussion and conclusion sections shows that the Vietnamese students compared favorably with both native and non-native students in the BAWE subcorpus in terms of lexical density measured as type to token ratio, but their use of both discipline-specific and “core academic” words was slightly more limited, and they relied more on repetition of the most common words in English. Between drafts, the overall length of writing expanded by approximately 17%, and students collectively added 302 word types, including 25 core academic and 11 discipline specific. The study suggests that vocabulary cannot be disentangled completely from other aspects of academic writing such as lexical bundles, syntax, and cohesion, and these require more investigation in advanced students writing in an EFL environment.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica Silva Henrí­quezes-ES
dc.relationhttp://ediciones.ucsh.cl/ojs/index.php/lyl/article/view/3145/2741
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2023 Literatura y Lingüísticaes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceLiteratura y Linguí­stica; No. 46 (2022): Literatura y Lingüística; 251-279en-US
dc.sourceLiteratura y Lingüística; Núm. 46 (2022): Literatura y Lingüística; 251-279es-ES
dc.source0717-621X
dc.source0716-5811
dc.subjectacademic writingen-US
dc.subjectcorpus analysisen-US
dc.subjectvocabularyen-US
dc.subjectacademic writinges-ES
dc.subjectcorpus analysises-ES
dc.subjectEFLes-ES
dc.subjectvocabularyes-ES
dc.titleAcquiring a scholar’s voice: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writingen-US
dc.titleAcquiring a scholar’s voice: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writing: Vietnamese students mastering academic vocabulary in thesis writinges-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record