Toulmin’s Analytic Validity
Validez analítica en Toulmin
| dc.creator | Botting, David | |
| dc.date | 2016-12-12 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-10T12:38:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-04-10T12:38:19Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://www.cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/278 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/24260 | |
| dc.description | Although Toulmin says several things that are plainly false, I hope to show in this paper that Toulmin’s conception of analytic arguments is not as incoherent as some have supposed and does in fact classify a theoretically significant class of arguments. However, analytic validity turns out to be not much different from semantic validity. Since the distinction between formal validity and semantic validity is well recognized by logicians, the charge made by Toulmin that they could not accept the distinction between formal validity and analytic validity is confounded. This eliminates one major plank in the case he builds against the analytic ideal. Thus, I want to defend Toulmin’s conception but reject the moral he draws from it. | en-US |
| dc.description | Aunque Toulmin dice varias cosas que son directamente falsas, espero mostrar en este trabajo que la concepción de Toulmin de argumentos analíticos no es incoherente como algunos han supuesto y que de hecho clasifica una clase teóricamente significante de argumentos. Sin embargo, la validez analítica tiende a ser no muy diferente de la validez semántica. Dado que la distinción entre validez formal y validez semántica está bien señalada por los lógicos, el alegato hecho por Toulmin de que no se podría aceptar la distinción entre validez formal y validez analític está confundida. Esto elimina uno de los grandes hitos en la empresa que él construye en contra el ideal analítico. De modo que me gustaría defender la concepción de Toulmin, pero rechazando la moraleja que él obtiene de ella. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Centre for the Study of Argumentation and Reasoning Faculty of Psychology, Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile | en-US |
| dc.relation | http://www.cogency.udp.cl/index.php/cogency/article/view/278/107 | |
| dc.source | Cogency; Vol 8 No 2: Summer 2016; 7-31 | en-US |
| dc.source | Cogency; Vol 8 No 2: Summer 2016; 7-31 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 0718-8285 | |
| dc.title | Toulmin’s Analytic Validity | en-US |
| dc.title | Validez analítica en Toulmin | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | Peer-reviewed Article | en-US |