Show simple item record

dc.creatorSáinz, Norbertoes
dc.date2017-04-20
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-06T15:05:08Z
dc.date.available2025-10-06T15:05:08Z
dc.identifierhttps://www.revistaproyecciones.cl/index.php/proyecciones/article/view/1466
dc.identifier10.4067/S0716-09172005000200003
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/255564
dc.descriptionThe theory of special relativity (TSR) exhibits an unquestionable success, at the expense of an unresolved axiomatic conflict with functional analysis and operator theory, as this paper demonstrates. These mathematical disciplines —amongst the newest developments in the field— could not possibly be incorporated into the original formulation of the TSR because they were in an incipient state at the turn of the 20th century when the TSR was being formulated, maturing only decades later.es
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad Católica del Norte.en
dc.relationhttps://www.revistaproyecciones.cl/index.php/proyecciones/article/view/1466/1247
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2005 Proyecciones. Journal of Mathematicsen
dc.sourceProyecciones (Antofagasta); Vol. 24 No. 2 (2005); 121-152en
dc.sourceProyecciones. Revista de Matemática; Vol. 24 Núm. 2 (2005); 121-152es
dc.source0717-6279
dc.source10.22199/issn.0717-6279-2005
dc.titleInertial relativity - a functional analysis reviewes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record