ANALYSIS OF CHILEAN CASE LAW ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGNARBITRAL AWARDS

dc.creator	Palominos Aravena,Orlando
dc.date	2018-05-01
dc.date.accessioned	2019-04-25T13:01:16Z
dc.date.available	2019-04-25T13:01:16Z
dc.identifier	https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-34372018000200381
dc.identifier.uri	http://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/64557
dc.description	ABSTRACT: Chilean law has been supportive of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. Law No. 19,971 of 2004 extended such support to international arbitration and introduced a clear pro-enforcement bias in favour of foreign arbitral awards. However, court decisions remain rooted in requirements and analysis that are inconsistent with Law No. 19,971 of 2004 and applicable international treaties, which may affect the Chilean pro-arbitration profile.
dc.format	text/html
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Derecho
dc.relation	10.4067/S0718-34372018000200381
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source	Revista chilena de derecho v.45 n.2 2018
dc.subject	Foreign arbitral awards
dc.subject	exequatur
dc.subject	defences
dc.subject	Law No. 19,971 of 2004
dc.subject	New York Convention.
dc.title	ANALYSIS OF CHILEAN CASE LAW ON THE RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGNARBITRAL AWARDS