Show simple item record

How do we densify and socially integrate our cities? On the efficiency of urban property incentives in the vicinity of mass transit stations

dc.contributoren-US
dc.creatorGreene, Margarita; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos. Escuela de Arquitectura, CEDEUS.
dc.creatorMora, Rodrigo; Universidad Diego Portales, Escuela de Arquitectura, Arte y Diseño.
dc.creatorWaintrub, Natan; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Ingeniería. Departamento de Ingeniería de Transporte y Logística.
dc.creatorFigueroa, Cristhian; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos. Escuela de Arquitectura.
dc.creatorde Dios Ortúzar, Juan; Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Facultad de Ingeniería. Departamento de Ingeniería de Transporte y Logística.
dc.date2017-02-04
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T12:19:47Z
dc.date.available2019-05-03T12:19:47Z
dc.identifierhttp://revistadelaconstruccion.uc.cl/index.php/rdlc/article/view/662
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/83886
dc.descriptionStated choice methods was used to quantify the effects of different types of incentives (direct, indirect, changes in building regulations, etc.) in the willingness to increase density and reduce social segregation through residential projects in the vicinity of mass transit stations. A sample of 52 professionals from building companies and real-estate firms was asked to evaluate a series of urban scenarios under various incentive schemes and choose, in each case, when would they be prepared to start a conventional residential project (i.e. for buyers belonging to the same socio-economic group) or a socially integrated one (i.e. mixing buyers from different socio-economic groups). Results show that at an aggregate level, only 16% of developers would be interested in starting new residential projects at those locations. However, the availability of incentives could have a significant impact in the willingness to initiate increased density projects around the stations and also, but to a smaller degree, in the willingness to initiate mixed-housing projects.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE CHILEen-US
dc.relationhttp://revistadelaconstruccion.uc.cl/index.php/rdlc/article/view/662/153
dc.relationhttp://revistadelaconstruccion.uc.cl/index.php/rdlc/article/downloadSuppFile/662/437
dc.sourceRevista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction; Vol 15, No 3 (2016): Revista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction; 77-86en-US
dc.source0718-915X
dc.source0717-7925
dc.subjecten-US
dc.subjecten-US
dc.titleHow do we densify and socially integrate our cities? On the efficiency of urban property incentives in the vicinity of mass transit stationsen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.typePeer-reviewed Articleen-US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record