Show simple item record

Sentence N ° 9/2004 Of the Court of Defense of the Free Competition: "Consultation of AGIP A.G On Conduct of Supermarkets Lider in Damage of Provider and Consumers in General"

dc.creatorFiegelist Venturelli, Boris
dc.date2019-01-09
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T14:08:29Z
dc.date.available2019-05-03T14:08:29Z
dc.identifierhttps://rduss.com/index.php/rduss/article/view/218
dc.identifier.urihttp://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/89784
dc.descriptionLas cadenas de supermercados que han sido parte en esta causa deben abstenerse de realizar conductas que impliquen alterar ex post y unilateralmente el precio y las demás condiciones de las compras previamente acordadas con los proveedores. Asimismo, las cadenas de supermercados que han sido parte en esta causa deben establecer en forma objetiva y no discriminatoria las condiciones en las que efectuarán sus compras a los proveedores, debiendo informar a cada uno de ellos, antes de efectuarles compras, cuáles son éstas. Considerando que AGIP no formalizó una denuncia o demanda por dichos hechos, sino únicamente una consulta, según se lee en su presentación de fojas 25, este Tribunal no aplicará sanción a D & S, pero le previene que debe abstenerse de efectuar prácticas como la indicada.es-ES
dc.descriptionThe supermarket chains that have been part of this cause should refrain from carrying out behaviors that imply altering ex post and unilaterally the price and other conditions of purchases previously agreed with the suppliers. The supermarket chains that have been part of this cause should refrain from carrying out behaviors that imply altering ex post and unilaterally the price and other conditions of purchases previously agreed with the suppliers. Likewise, the supermarket chains that have been part of this cause must establish in an objective and non-discriminatory way the conditions in which they will make their purchases from the suppliers, and must inform each of them, before making purchases, which ones they are. Considering that AGIP did not formalize a complaint or demand for such facts, but only a consultation, as it reads in its presentation of pages 25, this Court will not apply sanctions to D & S, but it warns that it must refrain from carrying out practices as indicated .en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherUniversidad San Sebastiánes-ES
dc.relationhttps://rduss.com/index.php/rduss/article/view/218/162
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2006 Boris Fiegelist Venturellies-ES
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista de Derecho; Vol 8 (2006): Revista de Derecho y Ciencias Penales Universidad San Sebastián; 99 - 112en-US
dc.sourceRevista de Derecho, Ciencias Sociales y Políticas; Vol. 8 (2006): Revista de Derecho y Ciencias Penales Universidad San Sebastián; 99 - 112es-ES
dc.source0718-302X
dc.titleSENTENCIA N°9/2004 DEL TRIBUNAL DE DEFENSA DE LA LIBRE COMPETENCIA: "CONSULTA DE AGIP A.G SOBRE CONDUCTA DE SUPERMERCADOS LÍDE EN PERJUICIO DE PROVEEDOR Y CONSUMIDORES EN GENERAL"es-ES
dc.titleSentence N ° 9/2004 Of the Court of Defense of the Free Competition: "Consultation of AGIP A.G On Conduct of Supermarkets Lider in Damage of Provider and Consumers in General"en-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record