| dc.contributor | | es-ES |
| dc.creator | Meier, Till | |
| dc.date | 2018-12-21 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-06T15:44:19Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-06-06T15:44:19Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://www.revistaiusnovum.cl/index.php/REIN/article/view/23 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/99240 | |
| dc.description | This article addresses the arbitrators’ selection of the law applicable to the merits of the dispute. It presents the common methods and scrutinises the “direct choice” approach as the latest trend. Finally, an alternative approach to determine the substantive law is illustrated. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Centro de Estudios Ius Novum | es-ES |
| dc.relation | http://www.revistaiusnovum.cl/index.php/REIN/article/view/23/16 | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2018 Till Meier | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista de Estudios Ius Novum; Vol. 11, Núm. 2 (2018) | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2452-4263 | |
| dc.source | 0718-5510 | |
| dc.title | Conflict of laws rules in international arbitration – The “direct choice” approach | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | | es-ES |
