Show simple item record

Argument-structure and implicational constructions in a knowledge base

Argument-structure and implicational constructions in a knowledge base

dc.creatorLuzondo-Oyón, Alba
dc.creatorRuiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José
dc.date2017-03-31
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-01T19:43:39Z
dc.date.available2022-12-01T19:43:39Z
dc.identifierhttp://onomazein.letras.uc.cl/index.php/onom/article/view/30241
dc.identifier10.7764/onomazein.35.04
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/216723
dc.descriptionThis paper provides formalized, machine-tractable representations of two broad kinds of constructional configuration, argument-structure and implicational constructions, on the basis of previous linguistic analyses. It discusses computational implementation requirements on constructional description. In this respect, the paper argues that the Goldbergian approach (cf. Goldberg, 2006) provides the best fit for the implementation of implicational constructions, while a “mini-constructionist” account (cf. Boas, 2014) is suitable for argumentstructure constructions. Because of their representativeness, we have chosen to illustrate our discussion by making reference to the family of English resultatives, which are argumentstructure constructions, and to the family of Wh-attitudinal constructions, which are implicational. Computational implementation demands that the members of the family of the resultative be split into mini-constructions, while the complexity of implicational configurations requires that different formal variants be grouped together under one single computational representation. The paper further makes explicit proposals for the machine tractability of lexical-constructional integration and of meaning implications that have reached constructional status through entrenchment, two problems that remain unsolved within standard computational approaches to language processing.en-US
dc.descriptionThis paper provides formalized, machine-tractable representations of two broad kinds of constructional configuration, argument-structure and implicational constructions, on the basis of previous linguistic analyses. It discusses computational implementation requirements on constructional description. In this respect, the paper argues that the Goldbergian approach (cf. Goldberg, 2006) provides the best fit for the implementation of implicational constructions, while a “mini-constructionist” account (cf. Boas, 2014) is suitable for argumentstructure constructions. Because of their representativeness, we have chosen to illustrate our discussion by making reference to the family of English resultatives, which are argumentstructure constructions, and to the family of Wh-attitudinal constructions, which are implicational. Computational implementation demands that the members of the family of the resultative be split into mini-constructions, while the complexity of implicational configurations requires that different formal variants be grouped together under one single computational representation. The paper further makes explicit proposals for the machine tractability of lexical-constructional integration and of meaning implications that have reached constructional status through entrenchment, two problems that remain unsolved within standard computational approaches to language processing.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherFacultad de Letras de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chilees-ES
dc.relationhttp://onomazein.letras.uc.cl/index.php/onom/article/view/30241/23595
dc.sourceOnomázein ; No. 35: 2017; 25-48en-US
dc.sourceOnomázein ; Núm. 35: 2017; 25-48es-ES
dc.source0718-5758
dc.subjectConstructionses-ES
dc.subjectConstruction Grammares-ES
dc.subjectcognitive modelses-ES
dc.subjectknowledge-basees-ES
dc.subjectLexical Constructional Modeles-ES
dc.subjectNatural Language Processinges-ES
dc.subjectConstructionsen-US
dc.subjectConstruction Grammaren-US
dc.subjectcognitive modelsen-US
dc.subjectknowledge-baseen-US
dc.subjectLexical Constructional Modelen-US
dc.subjectNatural Language Processing.en-US
dc.titleArgument-structure and implicational constructions in a knowledge baseen-US
dc.titleArgument-structure and implicational constructions in a knowledge basees-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record