Show simple item record

dc.creatorRusso, Jane A.
dc.date2019-02-07
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-28T19:57:40Z
dc.date.available2022-12-28T19:57:40Z
dc.identifierhttps://praxispsy.udp.cl/index.php/praxispsi/article/view/14
dc.identifier10.32995/praxispsy.v0i1.14
dc.identifier.urihttps://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/218596
dc.descriptionI should begin by explaining that my point of view is somewhat different from the authors ́. My tools of analysis are Weberian sociology and Bourdieu’s writings on the constitution of the professional and scientific fields, rather than psychosocial studies, with which I have little familiarity. In their work, Frosh and Mandelbaum discuss how Brazilian psychoanalysis, in a process that could be interpreted as denial, coexisted with the military dictatorship and its whole repressive apparatus without expressing the slightest sign of criticism or opposition to the country’s social and political circumstances. It would even be fair to say that psychoanalysis flourished at the height of the dictatorship and was spread as a therapy and world view through the media and the discourse of a captivated intelligentsia.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languagespa
dc.publisherFacultad de Psicología de la Universidad Diego Portaleses-ES
dc.relationhttps://praxispsy.udp.cl/index.php/praxispsi/article/view/14/10
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2019 Praxis y Culturas Psi - UDP CISes-ES
dc.sourcePraxispsi; No. 1 (2019): Praxis y Culturas Psi, Nueva Etapa.en-US
dc.sourcePraxis Psy; Núm. 1 (2019): Praxis y Culturas Psi, Nueva Etapa.es-ES
dc.source2735-6957
dc.subjectPsychosocial Histories; Psychoanalysis; Belinda Mandelbaum; Stephen Froshes-ES
dc.titleComments on “Psychosocial Histories of Psychoanalysis,” by Belinda Mandelbaum and Stephen Froshes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record