dc.creator | Kaplan, Robert B. | |
dc.date | 2017-05-03 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-16T14:00:44Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-16T14:00:44Z | |
dc.identifier | https://lenguasmodernas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/45813 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/38292 | |
dc.description | There are several complex issues to be considered in the formulation of language policy and literacy policy: first, the question of what language planning is and who does it; second, the question embedded in the history of human language and in the evolution of written language as well as in the functions that written language has over time taken over; and third, in the L2 situation, the question ofthe fit between the sub-varieties of each language and the functions allocated to the various sub-varieties. The problem is particularly complex in the domain of literacy, since a generalized literacy in an L2 introduced to a minority population does not in any way suarantee that the minority population will acquire access to the power language -that sub-variety which empowers native speakers of the L2 to manipulate the power structure to accomplish social and political ends, the absence of which in the minority population insures their disempowerment. | en-US |
dc.format | application/pdf | |
dc.language | spa | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Chile. Facultad de Filosofía y Humanidades | es-ES |
dc.relation | https://lenguasmodernas.uchile.cl/index.php/LM/article/view/45813/47841 | |
dc.source | Lenguas Modernas; Núm. 17 (1990); 81 - 91 | es-ES |
dc.source | 0719-5443 | |
dc.source | 0716-0542 | |
dc.title | Literacy and language planning | en-US |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |