Comparison between two techniques of harvesting connective tissue grafts in radicular coverage surgery.
Comparación entre dos técnicas de toma de injerto conectivo en cirugía de cobertura radicular.
| dc.contributor | en-US | |
| dc.contributor | es-ES | |
| dc.creator | Encalada Guerrero, Daniela | |
| dc.creator | Fuentes Arribada, Guido | |
| dc.creator | Ruíz Berger, María de los Ángeles | |
| dc.creator | Rojas Gonzalez, Carla | |
| dc.date | 2020-12-26 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-16T03:03:18Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-16T03:03:18Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.uv.cl/index.php/asid/article/view/2575 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.22370/asd.2020.1.0.2575 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://revistaschilenas.uchile.cl/handle/2250/165618 | |
| dc.description | Objective: To compare root coverage surgery results using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCGT) and de-epithelialized gingival graft (DGG) in Miller Class I and II gingival recessions. Material and Methods: A review of the literature published in the last 5 years, with articles selected from PubMed and Google Scholar databases, using the search key " de epithelialized gingival graft AND subepithelial connective tissue graft.” Results: A total of 250 articles were obtained. 245 publications were excluded through a manual filter because they were duplicated or did not meet the established criteria, obtaining 5 articles included in this review. Conclusion: Both harvesting techniques offer satisfactory results of coverage of root recessions. However, there is not enough evidence to state that one technique is superior to the other. | en-US |
| dc.description | Objetivo: Comparar los resultados de la cirugía de cobertura radicular utilizando injerto de tejido conectivo subepitelial (SCGT) e injerto gingival desepitelizado (DGG) en recesiones gingivales clase I y II de Miller. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura de articulos publicados en los últimos 5 años en las bases de datos PubMed y Google Scholar, se utilizó la llave de búsqueda “de epithelialized gingival graft AND subepithelial connective tissue graft”. Resultados: Se obtuvo un total de 250 artículos. De los que, mediante un filtro manual, se excluyeron 245 publicaciones por encontrarse duplicadas o no cumplir con los criterios previamente descritos, obteniéndose, finalmente, 5 artículos incluidos en esta revisión.Conclusión: Ambos procedimientos ofrecen resultados satisfactorios frente a la cobertura de recesiones radiculares. Sin embargo, no existe suficiente evidencia para afirmar que una técnica es superior a la otra. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Valparaíso | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.uv.cl/index.php/asid/article/view/2575/2563 | |
| dc.rights | Copyright (c) 2020 Applied Sciences in Dentistry | es-ES |
| dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Applied Sciences in Dentistry; Vol. 1 (2020): Supl. 1 | en-US |
| dc.source | Applied Sciences in Dentistry; Vol. 1 (2020): Supl. 1 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 0719-5761 | |
| dc.source | 0719-5761 | |
| dc.subject | Root coverage; connective tissue graft; de-epithelialization | en-US |
| dc.subject | Cobertura radicular; injerto de tejido conectivo; desepitelización | es-ES |
| dc.title | Comparison between two techniques of harvesting connective tissue grafts in radicular coverage surgery. | en-US |
| dc.title | Comparación entre dos técnicas de toma de injerto conectivo en cirugía de cobertura radicular. | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | en-US | |
| dc.type | es-ES |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Applied Sciences in Dentistry
[0-9]{4}