Browsing Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation by Title
Now showing items 282-301 of 320
-
The Democratization of Fallacies
. Cogency; Vol. 9 No. 2: Summer 2017; 31-46 -
The fallacies of Composition and Division Revisited
. Cogency; Vol 1 No 1: Winter 2009; 23-42 -
The fallacies of Composition and Division Revisited
. Cogency; Vol. 1 No. 1: Winter 2009; 23-42 -
The problem of fallacies: Objections to the usefulness of a theoretical concept
. Cogency; Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Winter 2021; 125-146 -
The role of abductive reasoning in legal evidentiary reasoning: a practice-oriented perspective
. Cogency; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): Summer 2021; 103-138 -
The Role of Ostension in Visual Argumentation
. Cogency; Vol 8 No 1: Winter 2016; 21-41 -
The Role of Ostension in Visual Argumentation
. Cogency; Vol. 8 No. 1: Winter 2016; 21-41 -
The role of semiotic regulators in the construction and execution of an argumentative instructional design
. Cogency; Vol 11 No 1-2 (2019): Winter-Summer 2019 -
The role of semiotic regulators in the construction and execution of an argumentative instructional design
. Cogency; Vol. 11 No. 1-2 (2019): Winter-Summer 2019 -
The Study of Legal Argumentation in Argumentation Theory and Legal Theory: Approaches and Developments
. Cogency; Vol 3 No 2: Summer 2011; 11-32 -
The Study of Legal Argumentation in Argumentation Theory and Legal Theory: Approaches and Developments
. Cogency; Vol. 3 No. 2: Summer 2011; 11-32 -
The Use and Abuse of Intratextual Argumentation in Law
. Cogency; Vol 3 No 2: Summer 2011; 33-52 -
The Use and Abuse of Intratextual Argumentation in Law
. Cogency; Vol. 3 No. 2: Summer 2011; 33-52 -
Theory of reasoning by goals
. Cogency; Vol 12 No 2 (2020): Summer 2020; 139-167 -
Theory of reasoning by goals
. Cogency; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): Summer 2020; 139-167 -
Toulmin’s Analytic Validity
. Cogency; Vol 8 No 2: Summer 2016; 7-31 -
Toulmin’s Analytic Validity
. Cogency; Vol. 8 No. 2: Summer 2016; 7-31 -
Towards the Definition of Logical Competence
. Cogency; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): Summer 2021; 7-40 -
Treating Kuhn's Gap with Critical Contextualism. Review of William Rehg, Cogent Science in Context. The Science Wars, Argumentation Theory and Habermas.
. Cogency; Vol. 1 No. 1: Winter 2009